You bear a great responsibility for this disastrous divorce.
You are to be blamed for having caused the maximum escalation in large part…
A student from the University of Washington has sold his soul on eBay for $400.
Lawyer Jay Leno
He’s a law student,
so he probably doesn’t need it.
That was no longer a home for me, no longer a home for my children.
You are also a woman.
You are also a mother.
When I discovered that my ex-husband had been having a parallel relationship with your best friend for over 12 years, it was no longer important by the time I realized it. He could have left immediately. I would have scattered flowers on his way out. I didn’t want to keep much either—my ‘wish list’ was modest and mainly included what I had brought from my family or earned through my own work.
What was not so insignificant was that this best friend, also a lawyer, became my first divorce attorney and caused me significant financial damage.
Neither of you had any scruples.
I left my ex-husband under the most adverse circumstances. ‘In tow,’ I had ‘only’ my three children, one of whom was seriously ill. Everything else that I had built up over a long life of work (I almost always earned more than my then-husband), I had to leave behind and was disposed of by an egocentric man (burned, given away, sold). There are evidence photos and emails from his side to prove this.
What followed was Germany’s most grotesque divorce, the suspicion of manipulation of the judiciary in Germany and Austria (due to all your good connections), and the suspicion of massive influence on my lawyers. One of them—as you know—took his own life after he fell in love with you (you could have been his mother).
I suspect you knew that my email was hacked and later my Wi-Fi was spied on (you included data in your legal documents that suggest this). The criminal police confirmed an external access to my data. Since I wasn’t working on ‘missile defense systems’ or similar, the circle of potential perpetrators is indeed very small.
I suspect you knew that witnesses were manipulated (especially in the custody dispute). This suspicion also extends to my former German lawyer, who didn’t want to ‘speak up’ during the civil trial against #UniCredit.
My ex-husband boasted for a long time about having founded and run a clinic abroad—the same information is available at the Austrian Medical Association. At the same time, he submitted an affidavit in Germany claiming poverty and inability to work, and I never received a penny of alimony. Simultaneously, my professional activities were sabotaged in the worst possible way, and my pension at #UniCredit was simply wiped out with a ‘snack note.’
What were you both trying to achieve with this? Was the ‘end goal’ ever articulated?
It is not clear why, in addition to lawyers who want to enforce our laws, there are no reconciliation lawyers who wish to spare us legal disputes.
Sigmund Graff
You were the one who submitted this affidavit to the court, even though you knew very well that he was earning more than 25,000 euros net per month in a good position abroad. You also wrote to the bank stating that I could only access MY safe deposit box if I transferred the remaining securities to your client. Shameless!
Shouldn’t a lawyer feel a sense of ‘vicarious shame’ in such cases? Isn’t that their moral duty? How far can lawyers go in defending their clients without making themselves liable to prosecution?
The duty of truthfulness for lawyers is established by the requirement for objectivity (§ 43a Abs. 3 BRAO) and their role as an organ of the administration of justice (§ 1 BRAO). A lawyer must prevent their client from violating the duty of truthfulness and must not themselves contribute to the dissemination of falsehoods.
They knew that he listed activities in London on his internet résumé that were untrue, and at the same time, they also knew that he forged an employment contract with MY company in London to execute the insolvency. Whether they knew about the wild stock speculation and embezzlement of my assets, I cannot prove. However, everything else, I can prove legally. To prove the forgery of the employment contract, mere human observation is sufficient. It doesn’t even require a court graphologist. Yet, they presented other forgeries of my signature to the court experts, and I must suspect they were aware of the manipulations. In any case, as a lawyer, they knew this approach was not legal. Yet, they did it anyway. In other proceedings, they clearly presented forged evidence. There is suspicion that court records were manipulated, leading them to report me to the prosecutor’s office. They knew that I had to have a life-saving operation performed on my child (otherwise, my child would have died of sepsis) and were not ashamed to sue me here because – at that time, we still had joint custody – his consent was not obtained. The list is long.
A divorce is NOT a business deal!
A divorce necessarily requires an agreement so that both partners can continue their lives, especially when children are involved. This cannot succeed if the goal is to ‘maximally’ destroy the other party.
You did everything in your power to ‘finish’ me off. You spread baseless rumors, just like my ex-husband, that I am mentally ill. This, despite several court psychiatric and psychological assessments that led to me obtaining sole custody—despite your attempts to sabotage in two instances. You also know that my ex-husband cleverly evaded any such examinations.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.
Friedrich Nietzsche „Jenseits von Gut und Böse“
And if you gaze long enough into an abyss,
the abyss will gaze back into you.
I overheard exactly how, before one of the hearings in Innsbruck, you whispered to the intern of the UniCredit lawyers about how wasteful I have been my whole life, just to create a proper ‘atmosphere’ against me. You shouldn’t think I didn’t hear that! Not only is that not true – leaving that aside – do you ever feel ashamed?
Heinrich, mir graut’s vor Dir!
“Faust”, von Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
My life’s mission has certainly been to learn how to defend myself against this overpowering man, and perhaps also against this overpowering, unjust judicial system, and a presumably corrupt bank that played a despicable game here against its own terms and conditions. Maybe someday this will bring about change. For all the victims who follow in my footsteps on the ‘weak side’ of divorce—whether man or woman.
I wonder what your life’s mission might be? Perhaps you should think about that.
The ex-wife on the other side.
P.S. I never tire of emphasizing that all my statements in this blog can be legally substantiated. Copies of them are stored in a secure location, in case burglars sneak through the house looking to destroy further evidence.
I’ve learned my lesson.
#survivor of a psychopath
