Protection against violence for women is also in many cases purely theoretical in Europe!

… because the continuation of the alleged unlawful actions is unreasonable for the plaintiff and/or associated with significant disadvantages, and furthermore, is not compatible with the fundamental values of the Austrian legal system.

Richter Dr. S., Schwaz (Österreich)

Has Judge Dr. S. in Schwaz ever considered the continuation of unlawful actions and the significant disadvantages associated with them for the V I C T I M ? ? ? ? ?

Not even anonymous reporting of these grievances is possible, according to the judge ? ? ? ? ? What kind of human rights and women’s rights-violating statements are these from a judge in Austria? Are these compatible with the Austrian legal system? And all this in 2022, in a country that wants to be seen as a model state for women’s rights according to the Istanbul Convention? ? ? ? ? ?

https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/agenda/frauen-und-gleichstellung/gewalt-gegen-frauen/istanbul-konvention-gewalt-gegen-frauen.html

I recommend reading the following literature:

1. Violence Against Women

34. The implementation of efficient measures against all forms of violence in close social circles, especially violence against women and children, is a central concern of the federal government.
35. As early as 1997, the Federal Act on Protection against Violence in the Family (“Violence Protection Act”) provided victims of domestic violence with comprehensive, unique protection across Europe. Accompanying this were the establishment of state-recognized victim protection facilities (intervention centers) and a “Prevention Council.” The latter coordinates state and private institutions involved in violence prevention at the federal level.
36. Significant attention is also given to the status of the victim in criminal proceedings. Victims’ rights have been expanded. Since 2006, victims of violence have been entitled to free legal and psychosocial support throughout the judicial process, which has been continuously expanded.
37. In 2009, the “Second Violence Protection Act” came into force. This act created legal frameworks to allow police or courts to order the perpetrator of domestic violence to leave the residence and prohibit return, presence in certain places, or contact, thus enabling the victim to remain safely in a familiar environment. Simultaneously, a violence protection center was established in each federal state, funded by the federal government. Courts and police authorities work closely with these violence protection centers.