Statement of fact.

In essence, a statement of fact is an assertion that can be proven. The proof must be accessible to a court, for example.

www.anwalt.org

Does a statement of fact remain a statement of fact if the court simply does not examine the matter, even though there is so much evidence and it has been submitted in a timely manner? Or does an unexamined statement of fact by the courts automatically become ‘false’, in other words, defamation and may not be expressed even though it is demonstrably true? Does a fact become automatically untrue just because the truth is ‘too much work’ for the courts and is not processed? Can one also not communicate an unexamined statement of fact anonymously because the truth is uncomfortable for some individuals? Is that then defamation?

If the processing of the criminal complaint takes so long that the statute of limitations for the statement of fact expires? Is the statement of fact still a statement of fact after the statute of limitations, or do the jurists then drift linguistically again so that a non-lawyer can no longer follow the facts? And thus, does an originally provable statement of fact become untrue? Just because the deadline has already passed? Just because the courts have not examined anything?